Wednesday 24 May 2017

Amy Hamilton Artwork Analysis.

Source 1
Amy Hamilton
‘Bear’
2015
Mixed media
Source 2
Amy Hamilton
‘Wolf’
2015
Mixed media

Amy Hamilton is an artist that focuses on the portraiture of wildlife and nature. This is something that she is extremely familiar with as she lives in Kingston, Ontario which is a city that contains large amounts of greenery, historic landmarks and a waterfront; she is able to receive a lot of inspiration from her surroundings so that she can produce some unique and striking compositions. The majority of her pieces are quite stylised and fairly illustrative which comes from the fact that when she was young, she decided that she would like to become an illustrator for children's books. As a young girl, her passion was to create short stories about the lives of certain animals, which is something that she wanted to convey in her paintings. After looking at an interview between her and junique.com, I found out that she was deeply inspired by documentaries that she watched throughout her life depicting what happens in the wild ; she said that they helped her gain her own perspective on nature and wildlife, which is something that she wanted to portray through her body of work. Her main objective that she wanted to successfully get across through her work is that nature is a beauty that we need to conserve and protect.

Despite the fact that both source 1 and source 2 have been created on a 2-d, flat background, Hamilton has been able to use different techniques in order to create a more 3-d format. For instance, the movement of the lines in source 2 are creating the impression of the fur moving outwards, creating the impression that the painting has been raised from the background. The fact that the direction of the fur is coming out from the main facial features (that being eyes, nose and mouth), could suggest that Hamilton wants us to pay attention to here as this will show the animals intentions and mood; the wolf in this composition is content, despite its usual predatory actions. Additionally, in source 1 as well as source 2, there is a slight colour wash around the edges of the animal, slowly dispersing; this gives depth to the piece and therefore makes the bear and wolf stand out from the background. The scale of these compositions are around an A5 and A4 piece of paper; this is why she uses more fluid brushstrokes and creates a smooth, rounded texture. The fact that she has used a small scale means that she can get more accurate movement in the marks, which as a result creates a 3-D impression.

Meanwhile, Hamilton uses layering as a method of building up form and depth so that the contrast in tone is high. In some areas of source 2, it appears as if she has used a runnier medium (i.e. inks or watercolour) so that she can get a lighter tone, when compared to the darker tones, which have been made by using thicker mediums such as acrylic paint. The result of this is that she can get a much more distinct differentiation in the darker and lighter areas. Moreover, in source 1, the different tones have been achieved by using different shades of the same or a similar colour as in the darker areas of the bear, where there are more shadows, a dark purple has been used, whilst in the lighter areas, a faint red and maroon colour has been used.

I believe that she has used certain colours to reflect the environment around the animal or its lifestyle. For example, the wolf in source 2 has been painted in blues, greys and blacks which represents night time which is the most typical tie to see wolves outside. In a similar way, the bear has been painted in purples, reds and light browns due to the fact that they live in forests (a place where you would most likely expect to see bears). The colours when combined with the types of marks create a mythical-esque mood and feeling. Hamilton uses a variety of types of marks in each piece that all lead to a slightly stylised composition; she uses flicking, detailing, washing, layering and in some cases using a palette knife. The contrast in marks leads to a more interesting piece as she has managed to capture the different areas of the body accurately.

Furthermore, she uses two different compositions with her work; she either centres the animals in the piece or she moves the animals to a corner of the background. This helps her show different sides to animals rather than always front view, like source 2. Another compositional technique that she uses is that she leaves a lot of negative space around the animal so that it stands out from the background itself. By doing this, she also creates a dream like scene as it aids in resembling a dream scape. From this, I am able to figure out that nature is one of her peaceful places and that she thinks of it as surreal and trancelike.

After having looked at her work in depth, I have come to the conclusion that I like her use of marks and how she has created high contrast by varying them throughout her compositions. Also, I like how she has managed to show the beauty of animals by using colour and smooth marks as this is something that I want to try and achieve myself. When I start my experimentations, I think that I am going to start off by getting used to the feeling of working with similar mediums. After this, I am going to experiment with colour and see what colours relate to different animals the best and figure out how to combine them. As soon as I am comfortable and confident with this, I will then go on to try drawing facial features with these mediums, as long as I haven’t changed any ideas by then due to other research and how I feel with these materials.

No comments:

Post a Comment

COURSEWORK EVALUATION.

From the very beginning of my coursework, my main intention was to show the differences in animals and humans in my work, however I abando...